🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.